Comments on: Multitasking from the Linux Command Line + Process Prioritization

By: gaarai

gaarai — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:30:03 +0000

Thanks Matt. I’m glad it helped you.

By: Matt Veety

Matt Veety — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:52:33 +0000

This was most definitely the best post on this subject i have seen to far. It great to know how to do these things for a non-X user.

By: Hua

Hua — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:40:55 +0000

THANKS dude

By: gaarai

gaarai — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:20:08 +0000

Glad to help Frank.

If I’m ever your way, I’ll let you know.

By: plymfrank

plymfrank — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:50:03 +0000

Ex-IBM mainframe bloke from years ago; setting up minimal-config Linux server with no previous Unix/Linux experience; your post succinct and to the point; just what I was looking for and no b*llox to wade through; thanks a million.

If all techie “explanatory” (!) posts were this good life would be so much easier (and the work so much quicker). Thanks again and Cheers! – if you’re ever in Plymouth e-mail me and I’ll buy you a beer, Frank.

By: gaarai

gaarai — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:58:07 +0000

I’m very happy to hear that you got use out of it. It’s one of my more in-depth posts, and I think for some people, it’s too much information. So, it’s nice to know that at least one person read through it.

By: William

William — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:14:16 +0000

* EXCELLENT * post. I was reading this month’s PCLINUXOS magazine ( http://pclosmag.com/html/enter.html) and got left hanging on how to get CLI prompt control back when running something.

This post was spot on and I absorbed (and tested in KONSOLE while reading) all commands. I know and understand that much more – very cool.

Nice job ! Thanks.

By: Optimizing Servers and Processes for Speed: ionice, nice, chrt, taskset, ulimit, and renice

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:34:11 +0000

[...] Multitasking from the Linux Command Line + Process Prioritization [...]

By: gaarai

gaarai — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:48:28 +0000

You’re welcome Norgus.

By: Norgus

Norgus — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:12:53 +0000

Just came across this googling the topic. Very handly, thanks.